From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Crashes in "C-h h" Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2019 07:28:13 +0300 Message-ID: <83muhvd9nm.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83y31hes6r.fsf@gnu.org> <83r279epwe.fsf@gnu.org> <09f72051-d740-9115-c6fd-c4344c749568@cs.ucla.edu> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="102304"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: pipcet@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 03 06:37:41 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hiX1Y-000QTS-KV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Jul 2019 06:37:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60668 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hiWsh-0000Os-TP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Jul 2019 00:28:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55528) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hiWsd-0000Om-M4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jul 2019 00:28:28 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:34033) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hiWsd-0003T4-4I; Wed, 03 Jul 2019 00:28:27 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3924 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hiWsc-0001HE-HH; Wed, 03 Jul 2019 00:28:26 -0400 In-reply-to: <09f72051-d740-9115-c6fd-c4344c749568@cs.ucla.edu> (message from Paul Eggert on Tue, 2 Jul 2019 19:38:00 -0700) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:238309 Archived-At: > From: Paul Eggert > Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2019 19:38:00 -0700 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Pip Cet wrote: > > Is there a problem simply testing FIXNUMP in this place? > > As Eli's revised code suggests, if n is in fixnum range, then instead of > (FIXNUMP (x) && XFIXNUM (x) == n) it's typically a bit cleaner (and faster) to > write EQ (x, make_fixnum (n)). It normally shouldn't matter either way, but in that case the comparison is done in a loop, so the make_fixnum call can be done just once, outside the loop, which AFAIU makes the loop a tad faster.