From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: evaluating numbers Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2019 09:24:08 +0200 Message-ID: <83mud5a4x3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <875zjw2emg.fsf@gmx.net> <618B38D9-CD34-4200-8CA1-1A6B0922A83A@traduction-libre.org> <871ruk2d3f.fsf@gmx.net> <3C929D7B-1C10-4713-9EDA-55C80FC36AD8@traduction-libre.org> <835zjvg385.fsf@gnu.org> <83sgmyd6rw.fsf@gnu.org> <4EC9C5ED-1633-4BB6-BA26-0C26E15F2FD4@traduction-libre.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="223600"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jean-Christophe Helary Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 09 08:24:25 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iTL6e-000w3p-Eu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 08:24:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35192 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iTL6d-0002fh-BC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 02:24:23 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34598) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iTL6W-0002fH-F7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 02:24:17 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:36331) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iTL6W-0000iX-Bv; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 02:24:16 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4475 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iTL6V-0005u4-Tz; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 02:24:16 -0500 In-reply-to: <4EC9C5ED-1633-4BB6-BA26-0C26E15F2FD4@traduction-libre.org> (message from Jean-Christophe Helary on Sat, 9 Nov 2019 09:20:45 +0900) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:242030 Archived-At: > From: Jean-Christophe Helary > Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2019 09:20:45 +0900 > > It seems to me that setting eval-expression-print-maximum-character to support only ascii is only a good > option if we don't have a smart way to evaluate integers without sifting through all the available fonts. What does that mean, exactly? If you want to suggest a different way of looking for a suitable font, please do. Otherwise, what we have now is the best our past and current font wizards could have come up with, and it's supposed to be quite "smart".