From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#39799: 28.0.50; Most emoji sequences =?UTF-8?Q?don=E2=80=99t?= render correctly Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 15:56:40 +0200 Message-ID: <83mu92g6hz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83lfongp4p.fsf@gnu.org> <835zfrglu5.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="41133"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rpluim@gmail.com, 39799@debbugs.gnu.org To: Mike FABIAN Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 28 14:57:14 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1j7g8f-000AYk-DD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 14:57:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47576 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j7g8d-0004cq-0T for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 08:57:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60563) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j7g8U-0004ce-Jy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 08:57:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j7g8T-0007VX-Qu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 08:57:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54864) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j7g8T-0007VP-OC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 08:57:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j7g8T-0004uh-N4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 08:57:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 13:57:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39799 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 39799-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39799.158289822018878 (code B ref 39799); Fri, 28 Feb 2020 13:57:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 39799) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Feb 2020 13:57:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60837 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j7g8S-0004uQ-7l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 08:57:00 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45418) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j7g8Q-0004u6-KS for 39799@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 08:56:58 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:39531) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j7g8L-0007Rz-Dv; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 08:56:53 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3517 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1j7g8K-0004mJ-Pp; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 08:56:53 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Mike FABIAN on Fri, 28 Feb 2020 14:50:48 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:176577 Archived-At: > From: Mike FABIAN > Cc: 39799@debbugs.gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org > Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 14:50:48 +0100 > > Robert Pluim さんはかきました: > > > Hmm, is "Symbola" still a good fallback font? Or should we add "Noto > > Color Emoji" or similar in front of it? > > I think "Noto Color Emoji" is nicer than "Symbola" if available. > The emoji look much nicer in colour, much easier to distinguish. Symbola covers much more than just Emoji. That was the main reason it was added to fontset.el.