From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs rendering comparisson between emacs23 and emacs26.3 Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2020 22:19:16 +0300 Message-ID: <83mu7pspu3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <834ku43c61.fsf@gnu.org> <83k12zz6ds.fsf@gnu.org> <054393f3-3873-ab6e-b325-0eca354d8838@gmx.at> <20200403174757.GA8266@ACM> <20200404104553.GA5329@ACM> <07fe3b69-3ab2-3173-0696-cb17809e2b91@gmx.at> <83blo7v68b.fsf@gnu.org> <1845d7aa-9ae4-3d95-6a30-c7b1d8d8adec@gmx.at> <83a73qt6zs.fsf@gnu.org> <97c4254e-ff43-8402-3645-f713c408c245@gmx.at> <83y2r9syby.fsf@gnu.org> <83tv1xsset.fsf@gnu.org> <83pnclsqew.fsf@gnu.org> <86imid3fre.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="33954"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, acm@muc.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?andr=E9s_ram=EDrez?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 05 21:20:09 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jLAoS-0008jC-N6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 21:20:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51060 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jLAoR-0007Bu-PS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 15:20:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39921) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jLAnt-0006kT-6k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 15:19:34 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:41946) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jLAns-0007MK-Uz; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 15:19:32 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1572 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jLAnl-0000VO-Bm; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 15:19:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: <86imid3fre.fsf@gmail.com> (message from =?iso-8859-1?Q?andr?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?=E9s_ram=EDrez?= on Sun, 05 Apr 2020 19:16:05 +0000) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:246486 Archived-At: > From: andrés ramírez > Cc: Dmitry Gutov , > rudalics@gmx.at, > acm@muc.de, > rms@gnu.org, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2020 19:16:05 +0000 > > Whet I create an > emacs lucid frame and move to the scratch buffer and I write the > character 'w' (and also other identified characters but 'w' is the worst > case) that character is duplicated and also emacs lags for a few > seconds. I suggest to run Emacs under perf and see what processing takes most of those few seconds.