From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Changes for emacs 28 Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 13:33:12 +0300 Message-ID: <83mu1whac7.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20200910231420.kvqg6ohvxetpup5c.ref@Ergus> <20200910231420.kvqg6ohvxetpup5c@Ergus> <83zh5whl5p.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7211"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rekado@elephly.net, ghe@sdf.org, spacibba@aol.com, drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 11 12:34:00 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kGgNU-0001l8-5e for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 12:34:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48838 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGgNT-0000FI-4k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 06:33:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60734) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGgMf-00088U-O9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 06:33:09 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:56645) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGgMd-0000uI-US; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 06:33:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1896 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kGgMb-0002vw-A2; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 06:33:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Dmitry Gutov on Fri, 11 Sep 2020 13:10:29 +0300) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:255126 Archived-At: > Cc: rekado@elephly.net, ghe@sdf.org, drew.adams@oracle.com, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 13:10:29 +0300 > > >> 4) I see a redo added in the menu-bar unconditionally... should we do > >> the same in the toolbar unconditionally? > > I indeed think that the Redo icon should be added unconditionally > > (enabled only when there's something to redo, like the menu item). > > Are you not worried about the divergence between the menu items and the > toolbar, and the actual available bindings? I see no divergence in the proposal. So no, I'm not worried. > And also about the fact the menu item next to 'redo' doesn't call > 'undo-only'? What is "the menu item next to 'redo'"?