From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#44973: Add a macOS global hotkey function Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2021 17:04:42 +0200 Message-ID: <83mtxna0hh.fsf@gnu.org> References: <874kkw9gmq.fsf@gnus.org> <87lfdrhj4e.fsf@gnus.org> <83mtxvi5lt.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7nwbpds.fsf@gnu.org> <8735zf4wp7.fsf@gnus.org> <87y2h73i27.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24833"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 44973@debbugs.gnu.org, j@mremus.net To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 05 16:21:16 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kwo95-0006L7-TJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 16:21:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44490 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kwo94-0006VK-UI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 10:21:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53280) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kwo7w-0005oh-5W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 10:20:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59126) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kwo7u-0005l4-KJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 10:20:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kwo7u-0008RQ-GE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 10:20:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2021 15:20:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44973 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 44973-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44973.160985997832398 (code B ref 44973); Tue, 05 Jan 2021 15:20:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 44973) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jan 2021 15:19:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42436 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kwo7V-0008QT-KZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 10:19:37 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59896) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kwo7U-0008QD-9R for 44973@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 10:19:36 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:35244) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kwo7O-0002I4-VD; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 10:19:30 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3216 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kwnt9-0002hR-U3; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 10:04:50 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87y2h73i27.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Tue, 05 Jan 2021 09:26:56 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:197381 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: j@mremus.net, 44973@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2021 09:26:56 +0100 > > Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > > > Since this brings up the Macos version of Emacs into feature parity with > > what you can do in GNU/Linux and Windows, I don't have any objections to > > including it. > > (There's still the issue of code blocks, though -- we're not accepting > those until gcc supports those, I think?) Right.