From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Replacement for string-as-unibyte-function Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2021 16:58:39 +0200 Message-ID: <83mtwm5xeo.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20210131150133.0fd3b42f@gauss> <20210131215555.547fb92e@gauss> <838s877sb7.fsf@gnu.org> <20210201083352.44453701@gauss> <83zh0n67nh.fsf@gnu.org> <20210201154322.16f6955e@gauss> <83o8h35epj.fsf@gnu.org> <20210201195131.0c6b2a17@gauss> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35792"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 02 16:21:12 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l6xUM-0009AY-IN for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 16:21:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45884 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6xUL-0000Ck-GI for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 10:21:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52914) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6x8f-0005Xl-RY for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 09:58:45 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47105) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6x8f-0008Qs-Kh for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 09:58:45 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4091 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1l6x8c-0005kQ-PH for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 09:58:43 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20210201195131.0c6b2a17@gauss> (message from Joe Riel on Mon, 1 Feb 2021 19:51:31 -0800) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:127561 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 19:51:31 -0800 > From: Joe Riel > CC: > > I realized it was unclear after posting. What is different about the filter > function if I re-evaluate it and then rerun the program, so that the filter > function gets called, effectively, for the first time, after the call to > make-network-process? Does the presence of the :coding 'binary option > add advise to the filter function? No, what's important is that the first time the filter function runs and inserts something into the buffer, the buffer is already unibyte.