From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#459: Zero-length overlays, overlay keymaps, and `overlays-at' Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 14:50:20 +0300 Message-ID: <83mtqh5hmr.fsf@gnu.org> References: <485D204B.2@dr-qubit.org> <875yx6mijw.fsf@gnus.org> <83y2a25ktq.fsf@gnu.org> <87y2a2i7kc.fsf@gnus.org> <87k0lmi2ms.fsf@gnus.org> <83pmve5ez3.fsf@gnu.org> <87czrdi5rp.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26886"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 459@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, t.s.cubitt.98@cantab.net To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 20 13:59:18 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m5oP7-0006nq-PO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 13:59:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43278 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m5oP6-0001Yj-N9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 07:59:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37538) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m5oH9-0007up-HU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 07:51:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49698) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m5oH8-00058k-G8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 07:51:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m5oH8-00028E-Ft for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 07:51:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 11:51:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 459 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 459-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B459.16267818358157 (code B ref 459); Tue, 20 Jul 2021 11:51:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 459) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Jul 2021 11:50:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33011 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m5oGh-00027U-Hu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 07:50:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39690) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m5oGf-00027H-Bv for 459@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 07:50:34 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:41044) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m5oGY-0004nJ-AR; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 07:50:26 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3822 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m5oGW-0002hH-ST; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 07:50:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87czrdi5rp.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Tue, 20 Jul 2021 13:28:10 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:210330 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: 459@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, t.s.cubitt.98@cantab.net > Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 13:28:10 +0200 > > However... after implementing this, I see that `overlays-in' is > something that exists? And does include zero-length overlays? *sigh* > So `(overlays-in 1 1)' is the answer to this bug report. Oops. For some reason, I was under the impression that the OP tried overlays-in as well. I now see that I've just imagined that. Sorry.