From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10417: 24.0.92; Shell completion regression for shell-completion-execonly Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 19:32:47 +0300 Message-ID: <83mtp8w28g.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87fwfzfojb.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtp8p4ct.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33857"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 10417@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 23 18:34:20 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mICtv-0008Yi-5N for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 18:34:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36342 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mICtu-0004lF-6u for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 12:34:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47236) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mICte-0004iy-GI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 12:34:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59181) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mICte-0001fe-8k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 12:34:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mICte-0000fW-3p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 12:34:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 16:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10417 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 10417-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10417.16297363922510 (code B ref 10417); Mon, 23 Aug 2021 16:34:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10417) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Aug 2021 16:33:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42494 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mICsm-0000eM-2L for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 12:33:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59136) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mICsg-0000dn-7a for 10417@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 12:33:06 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:55676) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mICsa-0000u3-Tx; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 12:32:56 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2675 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mICsa-000445-Gq; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 12:32:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87mtp8p4ct.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Mon, 23 Aug 2021 17:28:50 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:212503 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: 10417@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 17:28:50 +0200 > > This was a decade ago, and I'm unable to reproduce this in Emacs 25.1 > (or the current trunk). The original report was in Emacs 24, not 25. I don't have a working Emacs 24 on Unix to try this. For the trunk, it could be that the completion-style preferences changed the default behavior. Note that the original report specifies an order of completion functions.