From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: OKURI-NASI Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 05:28:24 +0300 Message-ID: <83mtezkb3r.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87y1ykxfd2.fsf@gnus.org> <87tu98xf5q.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29361"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon May 30 04:29:20 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nvV9j-0007Ue-VN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 30 May 2022 04:29:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33086 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nvV9i-0007AP-LJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 29 May 2022 22:29:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60000) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nvV8q-0006Sl-Sb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 May 2022 22:28:24 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:57834) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nvV8q-0005bh-IW; Sun, 29 May 2022 22:28:24 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=T9dxo8lgnWmMesJM8LYMHUVcffiZ8NylflDq0OCmuQ0=; b=m+OgMak+Tuib n+FrJMBd2ycHqxzO6c4YjTy06xLi8t8XLhs9M7DS00fnBEwOF72TQjYppkFI7BZxb1ayMsI4rkchx veM8uAMBr01k/a+SrzMN0yi3LGk85HOspUiUGiOO6OCJsEYojkKICz3Hs3aYa3iXnjW1mOVkkyAuZ E/7xQmyE7Dm281Bffzdwsvtnc0SEy8d0W7cEh0LENtc1E2+xXwL2uZgU66lpk63oyCTA1EhyTq6S/ +hzQTphL+qvIxEomDPDSSDQ6c5DMCGEBPx/UJl2E1x8/Z3GgZM+d5ZnLz81l3m/m7kauSh2vBubH2 YBHEIUkqtto/h7KEuVP40A==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3303 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nvV8p-0003cC-QO; Sun, 29 May 2022 22:28:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87tu98xf5q.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Sun, 29 May 2022 22:22:25 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:290369 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Date: Sun, 29 May 2022 22:22:25 +0200 > > Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > > > Because it's a bit annoying (especially since make isn't doing much else > > while parsing/generating the dictionary). > > Or perhaps we could just move generating that file until after we've > dumped Emacs for the final time? It would make things more parallel, > and we don't need ja-dic.el before we dump? Or do we? I don't know if we need it that early. The only way to know is to try. We seem to need it before loaddefs.el is generated, at least.