From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#62720: 29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 14:22:05 +0300 Message-ID: <83mt3d73c2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87a5zj2vfo.fsf@gmail.com> <87wn2modrm.fsf@posteo.net> <87ile6o2ov.fsf@posteo.net> <87y1mz38rl.fsf@posteo.net> <87ile2n0kn.fsf@gmail.com> <83v8i2abqi.fsf@gnu.org> <87wn2ilgx7.fsf@gmail.com> <83a5ze9uc1.fsf@gnu.org> <831qkq9rpy.fsf@gnu.org> <83pm898xb9.fsf@gnu.org> <87h6tlleg0.fsf@gmail.com> <8335558qc7.fsf@gnu.org> <83sfd5761f.fsf@gnu.org> <87zg7djrgr.fsf@gmail.com> <83o7nt73za.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37902"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 62720@debbugs.gnu.org, philipk@posteo.net, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 12 13:22:11 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pmYYF-0009ch-B2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 13:22:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pmYY8-0006hj-Gu; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 07:22:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pmYY6-0006hZ-P9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 07:22:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pmYY6-0006Zz-HF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 07:22:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pmYY6-00035O-10 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 07:22:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 11:22:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 62720 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 62720-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B62720.168129850211829 (code B ref 62720); Wed, 12 Apr 2023 11:22:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 62720) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Apr 2023 11:21:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39205 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pmYXm-00034i-57 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 07:21:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45300) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pmYXj-00034W-PW for 62720@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 07:21:40 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pmYXd-0006Xl-OI; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 07:21:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=uUvo0TETpigpRex9Yym4zWD9I1xPP4ZcLHiHNHW6PcI=; b=hrwLmfeWQDL6CtsDHgJ/ fbXicVSFMk+woQidVihVJH1BepNaCl4UPXhBJNnZ8Kmf75Zzro/aH38gU+FIItO3BR1aVsKJ29aQG fgFJxn9gYXisDmaDsGML/6jvzQXgLytTI11Vp5uyfk4vui07pdMZ/k1l7hV+mt+VV4BVaGQLzVzp6 UkKRLOqQz5D/AhlN1HVWmHacytWSE2hqyjT5SvD/tk23njdazLFkRRJHcEWCuzSxoiwwy3U2vwLw2 zHIzqfmA8RQqZsV+a/9YNDIl9581LHQqeljgtGEXrIkEpfATCZNqgh17CgOgiiBZa3+y12xTzC5Pu GjmB0KY8gE9DBg==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pmYXR-0001Hp-5e; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 07:21:32 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= on Wed, 12 Apr 2023 12:15:11 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:259726 Archived-At: > From: João Távora > Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 12:15:11 +0100 > Cc: philipk@posteo.net, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 62720@debbugs.gnu.org, > larsi@gnus.org > > > This has the same problem: it modifies a function that is called in > > too many places. package-installed-p has half a dozen callers in > > package.el alone. The change is tiny, but what about its > > implications on every use case where it is involved? > > What about them? I volunteer to help test whichever cases you (or > anyone else) think may be problematic. We will never be able to reveal them all, let alone test them, before Emacs 29.1 is released. > Can we put this tiny patch on master then? Yes, if Philip and Stefan don't object. But, since there will be a command for updating core packages, doesn't this go against your desire not to change the UX? > Maybe there's half a chance for a backport until the Emacs 29.1 > release, or a quarter of a chance that some future Emacs 29.2 will > also get it. I don't think there is such a chance, and I'm not sure we even want that, given that we are leaning towards a new special command.