From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#63344: 29.0.90; (shr-zoom-image) doesn't zoom to buffer size Date: Mon, 08 May 2023 14:34:35 +0300 Message-ID: <83mt2fcb04.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87jzxk39zi.fsf@codeisgreat.org> <83sfc8eblo.fsf@gnu.org> <87fs882typ.fsf@codeisgreat.org> <83ednse117.fsf@gnu.org> <87r0rre7ix.fsf@codeisgreat.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16474"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 63344@debbugs.gnu.org To: Pankaj Jangid , Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon May 08 13:34:17 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pvz8D-0003z3-CN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 08 May 2023 13:34:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pvz84-00076J-K6; Mon, 08 May 2023 07:34:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pvz7y-00075T-AA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 May 2023 07:34:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pvz7y-0006D1-2Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 May 2023 07:34:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pvz7x-0001WR-UV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 May 2023 07:34:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 08 May 2023 11:34:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 63344 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 63344-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B63344.16835456225822 (code B ref 63344); Mon, 08 May 2023 11:34:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 63344) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 May 2023 11:33:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39459 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pvz7d-0001Vo-TT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 May 2023 07:33:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56604) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pvz7c-0001Vc-64 for 63344@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 May 2023 07:33:40 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pvz7W-00066A-Po; Mon, 08 May 2023 07:33:34 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=/mNU8nbEOH+KsDwzHyZ2d224bMz1EHTnLuUp2IvoCMw=; b=GgfVQMrNp+SE arKK7Z6or9Xgkd7tBvQCDjfCUCkLKcZfzqyAxD4Fp3TW7YqR5NQJ4kzjS5bDeXeiBWozKNA342up9 RrTyGdmnXZxgMBz++ITuQNglU78zt3D7YmvYZ1+LlzmvMUWbD6DwenIIJrzlxeJQoFOonW6+XVDJn COkeGLBzH0qGYMiDRPXsJKjObSMXwieWgnRYSoZDdKNHtC1dlv7lA2WXxePk9WvY/fsMdhwIqZDzT PWCXvbXjDdbOKmfZ3aCrMo+j4RH3VWslcDszY0SaFl9t6XFAEHv4/W7orA6nhVvddwPX9F//b4Czn yIrCjOMTabfRpjiC7SDheA==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pvz7W-0001GN-9c; Mon, 08 May 2023 07:33:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87r0rre7ix.fsf@codeisgreat.org> (message from Pankaj Jangid on Mon, 08 May 2023 10:36:46 +0530) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:261308 Archived-At: > From: Pankaj Jangid > Cc: 63344@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Mon, 08 May 2023 10:36:46 +0530 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Thanks. But what do you understand "full buffer size" to mean for the > > dimension of an image? > > I understood that "full buffer size" implies "window width" or may be > "window height" if the aspect ration of image is that way. > > If that is not the case then I have no clue what "full buffer size" > means. "Full buffer size" wrt an image is confusing in any case (an Emacs buffer has no "dimensions"), but my reading of the code is that it is interpreted as the window dimensions, unless the original size is smaller than that. Not sure if I'm right, though. Adding Lars, who wrote that code, in the hope that he could clarify this.