From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: split up process.c [was: Re: Changes in process.c]
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 23:35:33 +0300
Message-ID: <83lj9lbtka.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <83d3ux7ris.fsf@gnu.org> <yxqwrt5q008.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1278621466 3868 80.91.229.12 (8 Jul 2010 20:37:46 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 20:37:46 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Dan Nicolaescu <dann@gnu.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 08 22:37:44 2010
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1OWxqp-0007PL-Mr
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 08 Jul 2010 22:37:43 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51860 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1OWxqp-0005aM-58
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 08 Jul 2010 16:37:43 -0400
Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=45449 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OWxqj-0005aE-I2
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Jul 2010 16:37:38 -0400
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1OWxqi-0001DF-Lp
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Jul 2010 16:37:37 -0400
Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:37586)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1OWxqg-0001CR-F9; Thu, 08 Jul 2010 16:37:34 -0400
Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by
	a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id
	<0L5900K00AM2XD00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>;
	Thu, 08 Jul 2010 23:37:33 +0300 (IDT)
Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.120.144]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il
	(HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id
	<0L5900IZJAMKU250@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>;
	Thu, 08 Jul 2010 23:37:33 +0300 (IDT)
In-reply-to: <yxqwrt5q008.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:126921
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/126921>

> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> From: Dan Nicolaescu <dann@gnu.org>
> Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 14:52:39 -0400
> 
> Why don't we split the part for supporting MS-DOS into a different
> file: process-no-subprocesses.c (or some better name)
> 
> That makes the file easier to read, less clunky, and problems easier
> to catch with a simple grep.

It will still leave two implementations of the same code.  If we want
to avoid that, the solution will need to be more radical than that.