From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Selection changes in revno 100822 Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 16:27:12 +0300 Message-ID: <83lj89tjdb.fsf@gnu.org> References: <834oeyv3ww.fsf@gnu.org> <87mxsqyp98.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <83zkwptyij.fsf@gnu.org> <87tymx38m2.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <83tymxtuzm.fsf@gnu.org> <83pqxltmgr.fsf@gnu.org> <87lj892wzg.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <83mxsptkho.fsf@gnu.org> <871va12uqt.fsf@catnip.gol.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1281792571 30173 80.91.229.12 (14 Aug 2010 13:29:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 13:29:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Miles Bader Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 14 15:29:30 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OkGni-0007PC-20 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 15:29:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45586 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OkGnh-0000Yu-HE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 09:29:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44046 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OkGnY-0000WX-2b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 09:29:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OkGnX-000598-3W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 09:29:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:47963) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OkGnW-00058t-T7; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 09:29:19 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L7500D009D39J00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 16:29:15 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.102.143]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L7500CPO9GQYFE0@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 16:29:15 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <871va12uqt.fsf@catnip.gol.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:128685 Archived-At: > From: Miles Bader > Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 22:23:38 +0900 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > >> No, if you select text with "C-@ >> "C-w" to get it in the primary) > > > > The last part, about C-w, is with x-select-enable-primary non-nil, > > right? With the default nil value, IIUC, C-w should _not_ put text > > into primary, just into the clipboard. That's what I understand from > > Jan's explanations. > > It's with "emacs -Q" Then it sounds like I misunderstood Jan, or maybe some other factor (transient-mark-mode?) is at work here.