From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8429: 24.0.50; regression: `flush-lines' does not flush all it should Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 23:47:42 +0300 Message-ID: <83lizov30x.fsf@gnu.org> References: <31A5E2DEB9B24F82A8AD85713507FE10@us.oracle.com> <83oc4kv5ko.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1302037646 29199 80.91.229.12 (5 Apr 2011 21:07:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 21:07:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8429@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 05 23:07:22 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7DT7-0007Ew-UF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 23:07:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36291 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q7DT7-0007mS-D7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 17:07:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47725 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q7DT2-0007mJ-Ux for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 17:07:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7DT1-0005xS-V2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 17:07:16 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:60883) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7DT1-0005xM-Ta for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 17:07:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7DBN-0002F4-Uf; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 16:49:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 20:49:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8429 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8429-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8429.13020364978568 (code B ref 8429); Tue, 05 Apr 2011 20:49:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8429) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Apr 2011 20:48:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7DAf-0002E9-Gg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 16:48:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7DAd-0002Dx-2j for 8429@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 16:48:16 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LJ700C005J6ZC00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 8429@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 23:47:39 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.47.180]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LJ700B7Q5RASHC0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 23:47:35 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 16:49:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:45652 Archived-At: > From: "Drew Adams" > Cc: <8429@debbugs.gnu.org> > Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 13:14:57 -0700 > > So the problem seems to be lazy highlighting. Unhighlighted text interferes with > search etc. because of the escape chars. Yes, it sounds like flush-lines should retry when it fails to find a match, after lazy-highlighting the next portion of the buffer.