From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12193: 24.1.50; 24.1.50; Completion broken in revno 109116 Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 18:41:41 +0300 Message-ID: <83lihhjxai.fsf@gnu.org> References: <3D68B660-2CCA-4191-9863-991E74EE5C61@mit.edu> <83sjbqk3fx.fsf@gnu.org> <078C7F77-D79A-4B6F-AD27-5078DEB53BED@mit.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1344958954 348 80.91.229.3 (14 Aug 2012 15:42:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 15:42:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 12193@debbugs.gnu.org, ueno@unixuser.org To: chad Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 14 17:42:34 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1T1JGI-0004W0-2O for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 17:42:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39098 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T1JGH-0001Rj-32 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:42:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50177) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T1JGE-0001Re-Fw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:42:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T1JGC-0000lv-8S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:42:26 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:46935) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T1JGC-0000lp-5g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:42:24 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T1JOY-0007KK-1p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:51:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 15:51:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12193 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12193-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12193.134495942928123 (code B ref 12193); Tue, 14 Aug 2012 15:51:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12193) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Aug 2012 15:50:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56481 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T1JO0-0007JY-Kn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:50:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:45900) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T1JNx-0007JO-AS for 12193@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:50:26 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M8R00H004VHBD00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 12193@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 18:41:37 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M8R00H714XCAV10@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 18:41:37 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <078C7F77-D79A-4B6F-AD27-5078DEB53BED@mit.edu> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:63153 Archived-At: > From: chad > Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 20:29:22 -0700 > Cc: 12193@debbugs.gnu.org > > On 13 Aug 2012, at 19:50, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > >> With this recipe, it still happens in revno 109117. > > > > Which is 500 revisions old. Maybe you should resync. > > I wonder if this is a bazaar numbering issue? My first report was from a sync that was less than an hour old; the second was less than 5 minutes old. I do have a few private patches on that branch, so maybe that's my fault? I'm a bazaar novice. If your branch is not bound to the upstream branch, then revision numbers are useless, because they have no relation to the trunk. You should then use revision-ids, not revnos. > P.S. I'll admit to being amused that my report mentioned that the cursor was in the wrong window, and I got the reply ``but the cursor shouldn't be in that window''. :-) I never said anything like that.