From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18310: 24.3.93; relative links don't work in eww and Windows 7 Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 18:25:45 +0300 Message-ID: <83lhqgmtqe.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83wqa2aqgu.fsf@gnu.org> <83lhqhbyvg.fsf@gnu.org> <83k361bqjx.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1408721189 9477 80.91.229.3 (22 Aug 2014 15:26:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 15:26:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 18310@debbugs.gnu.org, joaotavora@gmail.com To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 22 17:26:19 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XKqjK-0006Io-Dz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 17:26:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37833 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XKqjK-0000Uu-2R for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 11:26:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56371) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XKqjB-0000Sj-6T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 11:26:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XKqj5-0000UW-5u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 11:26:09 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42725) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XKqj5-0000US-24 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 11:26:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XKqj4-0004e4-BX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 11:26:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 15:26:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18310 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18310-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18310.140872115617844 (code B ref 18310); Fri, 22 Aug 2014 15:26:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18310) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Aug 2014 15:25:56 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49668 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XKqix-0004dj-Sb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 11:25:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout28.012.net.il ([80.179.55.184]:40660) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XKqit-0004dP-S7 for 18310@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 11:25:53 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout28.012.net.il by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NAP00B00S4B0K00@mtaout28.012.net.il> for 18310@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 18:24:51 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NAP00B47S5F2700@mtaout28.012.net.il>; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 18:24:51 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:92605 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 18310@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 10:39:13 -0400 > > > To be clear, I fully support your "early abort" cause. But one thing is > > aborting the command the other thing is aborting the process. I think > > you should do the latter if it's the Emacs' internals that caused the > > (supposedly unrecoverable) error. But you should do the former if it was > > the user's Lisp program that provided incorrect input. > > FWIW, I fully agree. Then we'll have to disagree. > Luckily I I don't need to use an Emacs compiled for w32 Then I submit that my opinion matters more than yours here.