From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Contributing LLVM.org patches to gud.el Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:20:53 +0200 Message-ID: <83lhk23yey.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87mw4rxkzv.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <20150208001527.GA30292@thyrsus.com> <20150209150411.1f0f4e4f@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <20150211111722.181a2201@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <20150211183700.04ec0613@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1423822878 32699 80.91.229.3 (13 Feb 2015 10:21:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 10:21:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Tom Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 13 11:21:10 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YMDN0-000821-2U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 11:21:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54300 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMDMz-0006ck-FB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 05:21:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60216) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMDMv-0006ce-Am for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 05:21:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMDMq-0005Tv-BN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 05:21:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout25.012.net.il ([80.179.55.181]:48904) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMDMq-0005SX-2r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 05:21:00 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout25.012.net.il by mtaout25.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NJP00D00FZEMX00@mtaout25.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:15:44 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout25.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NJP007DYGI8KK80@mtaout25.012.net.il>; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:15:44 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:183000 Archived-At: > From: Tom > Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 10:11:25 +0000 (UTC) > > I wonder how big is the actual C/C++ parsing code in GCC. If it > can be extracted it could even be linked statically with emacs. > Sure, in this case it would not be always the latest code, it > should be updated at every emacs release, but it would still > provide a far superior AST feature than what currently is available > in emacs. What for? Now that there's a GCC library, you can simply call its functions.