From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is it time to remove INTERNAL_FIELD? Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 18:23:25 +0300 Message-ID: <83lhhcuviq.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87lhhjuq26.fsf@gmail.com> <5538C48F.2020005@cs.ucla.edu> <87fv7rupcc.fsf@gmail.com> <5538C6C0.2000609@cs.ucla.edu> <83sibr15ac.fsf@gnu.org> <878udjun89.fsf@gmail.com> <83pp6v14cy.fsf@gnu.org> <87sibr84hb.fsf@gmail.com> <83oamf12ax.fsf@gnu.org> <87fv7rqcc7.fsf@gmail.com> <83lhhj10mb.fsf@gnu.org> <877ft0fpax.fsf@gmail.com> <83oamcxx99.fsf@gnu.org> <83k2x0xobm.fsf@gnu.org> <87d22oem75.fsf@gmail.com> <83vbgguw9j.fsf@gnu.org> <87wq0wmgn5.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1430236086 12661 80.91.229.3 (28 Apr 2015 15:48:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 15:48:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Oleh Krehel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 28 17:48:00 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Yn7jq-0003eW-UL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 17:47:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34548 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yn7jq-0006Tg-F4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 11:47:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48944) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yn7My-0003rg-AL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 11:24:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yn7Mu-0001yA-1U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 11:24:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:52804) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yn7Mt-0001xs-GD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 11:24:15 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NNI00400VXQDE00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 18:23:31 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NNI004XYW37AI70@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 18:23:31 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <87wq0wmgn5.fsf@gmail.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:185964 Archived-At: > From: Oleh Krehel > Cc: monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 17:11:58 +0200 > > >> Should I update the patch to include the underscores everywhere? > > > > Not everywhere, only where the fields are used in BVAR and KVAR. > > So that means everywhere If you say so, I didn't double-check that. > except allow to use BVAR and KVAR macros without an underscore. Did > I understand correctly? Yes, thanks.