From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Lisp watchpoints Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 18:10:53 +0200 Message-ID: <83lh9gokfm.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83wpt922dn.fsf@gnu.org> <87bnadjb7o.fsf@igel.home> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1448813482 6832 80.91.229.3 (29 Nov 2015 16:11:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 16:11:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jwiegley@gmail.com, schwab@linux-m68k.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Noam Postavsky Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 29 17:11:10 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a34Z9-0005e8-Ua for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 17:11:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36791 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a34ZD-0001ZI-Qw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 11:11:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56146) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a34ZA-0001ZA-1B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 11:11:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a34Z5-00077l-1g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 11:11:07 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout28.012.net.il ([80.179.55.184]:39376) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a34Z4-00077h-Q2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 11:11:02 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout28.012.net.il by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NYL0090038LWA00@mtaout28.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 18:10:01 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NYL00BC13KO2Z00@mtaout28.012.net.il>; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 18:10:01 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.184 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:195546 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 09:12:34 -0500 > From: Noam Postavsky > Cc: John Wiegley , Eli Zaretskii , > Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > Ffuncall does all necessary checks. > > It would signal in case of error right? Currently the code is ignoring > bad watcher elements (including out of range integers), but perhaps > it's actually better to signal an error. No, I think it would be better to report an error, and then continue, perhaps after removing the watch.