From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: UP and DOWN with multi-line minibuffer history Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 17:45:21 +0200 Message-ID: <83lh8v3ecu.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83wpsj6978.fsf@gnu.org> <87y4czz63l.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83lh8y5q3k.fsf@gnu.org> <87d1u9vqni.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83d1u94s23.fsf@gnu.org> <566F8C61.9040108@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1450194325 31423 80.91.229.3 (15 Dec 2015 15:45:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 15:45:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, juri@linkov.net To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 15 16:45:20 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a8rmy-0005vH-8a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 16:45:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37627 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a8rmx-0006pN-NZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 10:45:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57230) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a8rmp-0006p2-4i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 10:45:16 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a8rml-00021s-Aw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 10:45:11 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:55978) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a8rml-00021n-8s; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 10:45:07 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2861 helo=HOME-C4E4A596F7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1a8rmk-0002WM-Fl; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 10:45:06 -0500 In-reply-to: <566F8C61.9040108@yandex.ru> (message from Dmitry Gutov on Tue, 15 Dec 2015 05:43:29 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:196308 Archived-At: > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 05:43:29 +0200 > > On 12/14/2015 05:39 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Yes, it's consistency vs minor inconvenience in certain use cases. I > > think consistency should win big time. > > I'd say the choice is rather "consistency and inconvenience in some use > cases" vs "inconvenience in some other use cases". Yes, I agree. > I've never used the goal column, so that problem sounds fairly obscure, > personally. I think you are using it every time you use C-n/C-p. I didn't mean goal-column literally, I meant temporary-goal-column that these commands use internally to keep point on the same visual column.