From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Arbitrary function: find the number(s) of expected arguments Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 22:33:46 +0200 Message-ID: <83lh5e6wd1.fsf@gnu.org> References: <56E8906C.5050405@lanl.gov> <83egb68vfy.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1458419677 12429 80.91.229.3 (19 Mar 2016 20:34:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 20:34:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 19 21:34:31 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ahNZu-0002bh-Vp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 21:34:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50337 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ahNZu-0000Ki-4c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 16:34:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46331) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ahNZh-0000JE-3j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 16:34:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ahNZd-000391-U3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 16:34:17 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:35493) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ahNZd-00038x-RW; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 16:34:13 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4669 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ahNZd-0000xl-0g; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 16:34:13 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Sat, 19 Mar 2016 15:52:45 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:201900 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 15:52:45 -0400 > > > Patches to add func-arity to Emacs are welcome. > > Actually, I don't welcome them. I always resisted them, because I think > that using func-arity is a bad idea. I don't see why would that be such a bad idea that it justifies rejecting a patch.