From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Removing bugs from the blockers Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 17:12:31 +0300 Message-ID: <83lh3e82sw.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20160509235343.17047.73943@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <20160509235343.759D0220128@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <831t569wwu.fsf@gnu.org> <87eg96l06p.fsf@gnus.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1463148794 1850 80.91.229.3 (13 May 2016 14:13:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 14:13:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 13 16:13:06 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1b1Dpy-0005nD-2e for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 May 2016 16:13:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34679 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b1Dps-0001Ph-Sd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 May 2016 10:13:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33208) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b1Dpc-0001JM-2P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 May 2016 10:12:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b1DpX-0006Nc-8Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 May 2016 10:12:43 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:38500) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b1DpX-0006NS-5B; Fri, 13 May 2016 10:12:39 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4864 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1b1DpT-0004dA-7x; Fri, 13 May 2016 10:12:37 -0400 In-reply-to: <87eg96l06p.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Fri, 13 May 2016 12:30:38 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:203825 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: Dmitry Gutov , emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 12:30:38 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > My conclusion from reviewing these bugs is: I don't really understand > > how come some of the bugs were designated as "blocking". > > Did you remove the "block" from the bugs you didn't feel were > block-worthy? I didn't set the indication, so I don't feel myself authorized to remove it unilaterally.