From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: eval, load and -l Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2016 19:40:38 +0300 Message-ID: <83lh1gnim1.fsf@gnu.org> References: <871t381fca.fsf@gmx.net> <83wpl0nnmg.fsf@gnu.org> <87oa6cyu3m.fsf@gmx.net> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1467745372 7376 80.91.229.3 (5 Jul 2016 19:02:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 19:02:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stephen Berman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 05 21:02:47 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bKVcM-00063S-37 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2016 21:02:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57432 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bKVcL-0002zm-C1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2016 15:02:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43312) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bKTPb-0001Lm-HV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2016 12:41:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bKTPX-0005cs-Hi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2016 12:41:27 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:48081) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bKTPX-0005cf-Em; Tue, 05 Jul 2016 12:41:23 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3356 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bKTPT-0005o3-DR; Tue, 05 Jul 2016 12:41:22 -0400 In-reply-to: <87oa6cyu3m.fsf@gmx.net> (message from Stephen Berman on Tue, 05 Jul 2016 17:37:01 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:205196 Archived-At: > From: Stephen Berman > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2016 17:37:01 +0200 > > Can the recomputing in step 26 (or 27?) change the menu bar? It can resize the frame, I think. (27 runs a hook, so it cannot possibly be part of the issue here.) > Yet step 26 only refers to modifications specified in the init > files, which doesn't seem relevant to this case. They are relevant, because they also change the frame defaults. But I didn't trace into the code, so maybe there's some other factor in this specific case. I was just explaining why --load should be expected to produce different results in general.