From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Extra information in autoload error Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 09:30:25 +0300 Message-ID: <83lgxe5ke6.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87k2e5nfdr.fsf@gmail.com> <87fuosoq4k.fsf@gmail.com> <87a8dw8iad.fsf@gmail.com> <87wph06sl5.fsf@gmail.com> <83eg37pq55.fsf@gnu.org> <87eg36iwsu.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1477290670 3116 195.159.176.226 (24 Oct 2016 06:31:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 06:31:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alex Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 24 08:31:06 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1byYmJ-0004to-0T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 08:30:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44833 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1byYmL-0005v1-3C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 02:30:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57257) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1byYmE-0005uP-PX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 02:30:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1byYmC-0004iM-5K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 02:30:30 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:43621) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1byYmC-0004iI-1u; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 02:30:28 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1313 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1byYmB-0007LQ-3Z; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 02:30:27 -0400 In-reply-to: <87eg36iwsu.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Alex on Sun, 23 Oct 2016 15:24:01 -0600) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:208654 Archived-At: > From: Alex > Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 15:24:01 -0600 > > I was wondering if you preferred the version that used > > SDATA (Fcar (Fcar (Vload_history))) > > or > > SDATA (Fcar (Fcdr (fundef))) > > to get the extra information. The first one gets the file path, while > the second one just gets what was in the autoload object. Don't we want both? Can you show the textual description of the "autoload object" that is returned by the latter form? (Sorry, too busy with more urgent issues to try that myself.)