From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#21028: Performance regression in revision af1a69f4d17a482c359d98c00ef86fac835b5fac (Apr 2014). Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 21:52:37 +0200 Message-ID: <83lgvd581m.fsf@gnu.org> References: <559F9FAF.8090708@live.com> <83egkgb2wo.fsf@gnu.org> <559FF8F6.2060209@live.com> <55A652E4.5000606@yandex.ru> <56D7D5D3.4030103@live.com> <56D7DCC6.9060003@live.com> <56D7E2F6.2020008@live.com> <56D7E8D6.6080508@live.com> <831t7r1f41.fsf@gnu.org> <5ce0aa39-8a49-5cfd-2eac-343fae4505a1@live.com> <83fur3ysvk.fsf@gnu.org> <83dde388-a342-ed1e-1242-7953d9a0f525@gmail.com> <83lgx9ua9x.fsf@gnu.org> <389383ed-ce95-a558-e441-ba7cfa58d58e@gmail.com> <83bmy5u6qo.fsf@gnu.org> <2fd3e21c-37b9-d559-6306-4e8adebad3d5@gmail.com> <831sz0sfug.fsf@gnu.org> <83oa095eaw.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1482090857 9547 195.159.176.226 (18 Dec 2016 19:54:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 19:54:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 21028@debbugs.gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 18 20:54:10 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cIhX6-0000ja-1X for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 20:54:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41943 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cIhX8-0002o8-T6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 14:54:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43982) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cIhX3-0002mw-Hr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 14:54:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cIhX0-0002MO-Fm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 14:54:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:59271) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cIhX0-0002MC-D1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 14:54:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cIhX0-0006WY-64 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 14:54:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 19:54:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21028 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 21028-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21028.148209080625035 (code B ref 21028); Sun, 18 Dec 2016 19:54:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21028) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Dec 2016 19:53:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46437 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cIhWQ-0006Vj-Kx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 14:53:26 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52902) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cIhWP-0006VV-Nk for 21028@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 14:53:25 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cIhWH-0001y9-2N for 21028@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 14:53:20 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:34323) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cIhWG-0001y5-VR; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 14:53:16 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1145 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cIhWF-0004xL-NL; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 14:53:16 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel on Sun, 18 Dec 2016 13:04:09 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:127139 Archived-At: > Cc: 21028@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Clément Pit--Claudel > Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 13:04:09 -0500 > > > https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=21028#98 > > > > Did you try that? What were the results? > > Sorry, I missed that message. > > It works! But only for the original example (with Arial), AFAICT. Do you know what the equivalent fix would be for the recipe given in https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=21028#62 ? The same: use :family and :registry instead of :name. What did you try? And why does that example use 'format', but without any format spec? What am I missing here?