From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#40857: Invisibility specs do not apply to specified spaces Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 18:20:03 +0300 Message-ID: <83lfmh3qho.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1f66e993-8835-4777-7252-9b6de7331fc7@gmail.com> <83tv165l48.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="106494"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: cpitclaudel@gmail.com, 40857@debbugs.gnu.org To: Pip Cet Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 27 17:21:23 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jT5ZT-000Ra3-Fm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 17:21:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50902 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jT5ZS-0000eQ-Bx for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 11:21:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36646) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jT5ZA-0000bS-0O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 11:21:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jT5Z8-00044p-FS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 11:21:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54587) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jT5Z7-00042v-Vb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 11:21:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jT5Z7-0005NV-Q8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 11:21:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 15:21:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 40857 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 40857-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B40857.158800081520584 (code B ref 40857); Mon, 27 Apr 2020 15:21:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 40857) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Apr 2020 15:20:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37900 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jT5YN-0005Lv-4G for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 11:20:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33446) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jT5YL-0005Lg-Su for 40857@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 11:20:14 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:37663) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jT5YG-0000aC-IM; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 11:20:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4593 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jT5YF-0008G9-Mb; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 11:20:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Pip Cet on Sun, 26 Apr 2020 19:01:29 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:179156 Archived-At: > From: Pip Cet > Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2020 19:01:29 +0000 > Cc: Clément Pit-Claudel , > 40857@debbugs.gnu.org > > On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 3:22 PM Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > I don't think this is a bug. A "replacing" display property in effect > > forces the display engine to ignore the entire chunk of text "covered" > > by that display property, > > That's only true for text properties: a display property on an empty > overlay is ignored. Can you show a Lisp snippet for that? I don't think I have a clear idea of the use case. > The right fix, I think, is to apply the patch in bug#40845, possibly > extending it to pass in an "invisible" flag to the Lisp code that > calculates the actual display spec to be used. I explained elsewhere why I think we shouldn't move display functionalities to Lisp, except as the last resort, more or less.