From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#42194: 27.0.91; shr and rowspan Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 06:55:28 +0300 Message-ID: <83lfjikd73.fsf@gnu.org> References: <21201.1593888945@alto> <87v9inouxv.fsf@gnus.org> <87mu3zosbw.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6212"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 42194@debbugs.gnu.org, mkupfer@alum.berkeley.edu To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 17 05:56:10 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jwHTl-0001Wd-Ef for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 05:56:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56398 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jwHTk-0005Kv-AZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 23:56:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34600) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jwHTe-0005Kc-4s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 23:56:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44849) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jwHTd-0002TS-Qv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 23:56:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jwHTd-0007U1-Q5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 23:56:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 03:56:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 42194 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 42194-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B42194.159495815428752 (code B ref 42194); Fri, 17 Jul 2020 03:56:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 42194) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jul 2020 03:55:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56395 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jwHTV-0007Tg-Mi for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 23:55:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48988) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jwHTR-0007TL-Cj for 42194@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 23:55:51 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:34508) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jwHTL-0002Sj-Ic; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 23:55:43 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4690 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jwHTJ-00009l-Q2; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 23:55:43 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87mu3zosbw.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Fri, 17 Jul 2020 03:14:59 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:183131 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: 42194@debbugs.gnu.org, eli Eli Zaretskii > Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 03:14:59 +0200 > > Eli, I think the fix should be safe for Emacs 27.1, too, but I've been > out of the loop and I'm not sure what the status is at the moment. This > isn't exactly a critical bug -- rowspan isn't used that much these days, > and it's a very old bug. > > On the other hand, I think it's a pretty safe fix to add, so should I > cherry-pick it for Emacs 27.1? The above generally translates into "don't put this on emacs-27". But maybe if you tell more details about how it is safe, I will change my mind about this. Thanks.