From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25654: 24.5; linum and hide-show Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 17:45:59 +0300 Message-ID: <83lfil44wo.fsf@gnu.org> References: <58d28b7b-778f-3389-b8d2-3d5f1df9c20d@maths.ox.ac.uk> <83vask4jng.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26556"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: hajiali@maths.ox.ac.uk, 25654-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 11 16:47:16 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k5VYZ-0006nj-O5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 16:47:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54760 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k5VYY-0000u4-Q2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 10:47:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44380) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k5VYM-0000qR-QA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 10:47:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58050) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k5VYM-0005II-GU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 10:47:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k5VYM-0003YO-Dm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 10:47:02 -0400 Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 14:47:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 25654 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Mail-Followup-To: 25654@debbugs.gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org, hajiali@maths.ox.ac.uk Original-Received: via spool by 25654-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D25654.159715717911544 (code D ref 25654); Tue, 11 Aug 2020 14:47:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25654-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Aug 2020 14:46:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41358 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k5VXf-0002zl-7R for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 10:46:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34058) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k5VXd-0002ts-42 for 25654-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 10:46:18 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:43449) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k5VXW-0005DL-NM; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 10:46:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1636 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1k5VXW-0004jq-24; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 10:46:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Kangas on Tue, 11 Aug 2020 00:56:45 -0700) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:184659 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 00:56:45 -0700 > Cc: Abdul-Lateef Haji-Ali , 25654@debbugs.gnu.org > > >> To reproduce: > >> Create a new file, enable c-mode, hs-minor-mode and > >> linum-mode, create a huge block by typing: { C-u 10000 RET } then > >> execute hs-hide-all and watch Emacs become unresponsive. > > > > You may wish to try the alternative nlinum-mode, it performs better in > > this scenario. > > So is there anything more to do here, or should we just accept these > limitations in linum-mode? I think this bug report is OBE, since we now have display-line-numbers-mode, which doesn't use overlays. So I'm closing the bug; thanks for pointing out it is obsolete.