From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#51197: 28.0.50; [PATCH] get process-async-https-with-delay to pass Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 09:37:23 +0300 Message-ID: <83lf2ukd3w.fsf@gnu.org> References: <878ryw5ouk.fsf@dick> <87y26vwwed.fsf@gnus.org> <875ytzcjbj.fsf@dick> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1749"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 51197@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org To: dick Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 15 08:38:11 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mbGr5-0000Mh-Jz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 08:38:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46346 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mbGr4-0008Gx-7X for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 02:38:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60546) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mbGqw-0008Gj-Tv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 02:38:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54548) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mbGqw-0007o7-Ln for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 02:38:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mbGqw-0007Gm-FL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 02:38:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 06:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 51197 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch notabug moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 51197-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B51197.163427985427907 (code B ref 51197); Fri, 15 Oct 2021 06:38:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 51197) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Oct 2021 06:37:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37861 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mbGqU-0007G3-6F for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 02:37:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:58480) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mbGqP-0007Fo-Ok for 51197@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 02:37:33 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:49626) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mbGqK-0007HU-FM; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 02:37:24 -0400 Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=4961 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mbGqK-0006cu-2E; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 02:37:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: <875ytzcjbj.fsf@dick> (message from dick on Thu, 14 Oct 2021 18:50:24 -0400) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:217285 Archived-At: > From: dick > Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 18:50:24 -0400 > Cc: 51197@debbugs.gnu.org > > It's becoming increasingly obvious to me that I'm the only person in the > emacsverse who regularly runs `make check`, as no one else, including the > maintainers, seems to notice `make check` failures as quickly as I do. No, the rest solved the problem with that certificate, so the failure doesn't happen for them. The Internet is full with recipes for how to solve this.