From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: move_it_vertically_backward question Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2021 13:29:21 +0200 Message-ID: <83lf0ib17y.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87lf0pw78r.fsf.ref@yahoo.com> <83lf0nl56t.fsf@gnu.org> <875yrrtiwj.fsf@yahoo.com> <837dc7l2pa.fsf@gnu.org> <87ilvqty24.fsf@yahoo.com> <8335muj8zk.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7bang3d.fsf@yahoo.com> <83mtl1j527.fsf@gnu.org> <87zgp1mldh.fsf@yahoo.com> <83tuf9gdg5.fsf@gnu.org> <87pmpwkikp.fsf@yahoo.com> <83mtl0hnm5.fsf@gnu.org> <87czlwkfpk.fsf@yahoo.com> <8735mskal2.fsf@yahoo.com> <83ee6che8h.fsf@gnu.org> <87y24kisgf.fsf@yahoo.com> <838rwkhcqb.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1achulq.fsf@yahoo.com> <83pmpub41v.fsf@gnu.org> <871r2afarc.fsf@yahoo.com> <83mtkyb2er.fsf@gnu.org> <87v8zmduvr.fsf@yahoo.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12391"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 18 12:30:26 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1myXv0-0002zc-N9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 18 Dec 2021 12:30:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44628 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1myXuz-0003in-DZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 18 Dec 2021 06:30:25 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35896) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1myXu9-000319-QP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Dec 2021 06:29:33 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=47504 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1myXu9-0002t1-I6; Sat, 18 Dec 2021 06:29:33 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=fTMwSX91yc9lt83zzRs+o4BdBKvOV7IEgFFUCRjQ3sA=; b=NQJ8Jf6TMfKB Ua0YXXHE0hhsc+rRa4hDo8kKYyuW4plDmRvA4P1bOXDw8Wngoqjw/bP7dQTn0/NqCRublUJm993bx D116A0Uer9gyCig6eh3f+lwKWAuGCxlHFnz5t4gC98DiPP6jjl6h7vT8ZElNBsuKkBlRI2beGI4gI 9YctJVozwZ++NB0z4Lh7WLfL+gtiHHV76akWtpneggkZrK8TiPPAH5VUyCKbz16IGzxMRb5nczDgn lfcaQnxvdzr2YAZ/prUWLV46Fi50xU2wmEIK799w9CXb2wJxzJ0ccunhdEx5elHFyfHoS3FQWMoiD d/XVL8fezAQk8lUt3MpoeQ==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=1905 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1myXu9-0000Nd-A8; Sat, 18 Dec 2021 06:29:33 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87v8zmduvr.fsf@yahoo.com> (message from Po Lu on Sat, 18 Dec 2021 19:18:00 +0800) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:282280 Archived-At: > From: Po Lu > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2021 19:18:00 +0800 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Why do you need a flag variable at all? Cannot 'doff' serve as that > > flag? Or, if not, why not test the argument -- it's just one NILP > > test, after all? > > I get your point now. Is there any other problem with this patch, or > can I install it now? ??? I thought we still need to get the move_it_vertically part right, and then review the documentation?