From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] On the nasty "ghost key" problem on NS Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2022 13:40:10 +0200 Message-ID: <83leor54o5.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87leord0ei.fsf@yahoo.com> <87h6zfchpu.fsf@yahoo.com> <394D8618-AF36-44C4-BA64-7AFDFBBDC429@gmail.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12472"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: luangruo@yahoo.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Kai Ma Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 04 12:41:48 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oqv52-00036U-2M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2022 12:41:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oqv3p-0007Jc-Nl; Fri, 04 Nov 2022 07:40:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oqv3d-0007H0-B9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2022 07:40:24 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oqv3b-0000TI-Pl; Fri, 04 Nov 2022 07:40:19 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=1Zoi8fcHpm+lthtXxo43wzubnFOKn/95DDiL/UtkxZ4=; b=c5SZr833sLOt e7fOO8riqscOH2MRPxSEzuiqIapuT4TyWjXfFMSGsvFV0NTZ/n9Tqbp7rACztm/L/gcDXH7Wy56a4 GQqfqmOB2VY/Hz5kXc0jX9Or4X1i1oq91sGyqJIdsAlT+bhaKkkbL+WjKSCeZzY3CMXySg7g3e4vn VX61ME9bG4wfF+/6RtMEMyZv22dWjlOxFB2Roowi+wuRHbDvaVFjO9C/kuzhoV/74tHeQRWbm+OH2 whwvVu2736HcneO6N9SsP5yyg+NqgWiDue8G6NIfbwQ4vU7ZJ0sID1sQBQfUP1ygPrYwqEuCYmWgC kgeV/UtC/EaqkAEDptSlMg==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oqv3Y-0006vD-NQ; Fri, 04 Nov 2022 07:40:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: <394D8618-AF36-44C4-BA64-7AFDFBBDC429@gmail.com> (message from Kai Ma on Fri, 4 Nov 2022 16:53:34 +0800) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:299122 Archived-At: > From: Kai Ma > Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2022 16:53:34 +0800 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Pardon my ignorance, is there any reason to special-case the echo area? What window do you think FRAME_SELECTED_WINDOW will return when the user is interacting with the minibuffer in the mini-window?