From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Finalizing 'inhibit-automatic-native-compilation' Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2023 11:18:06 +0200 Message-ID: <83lelgxw6p.fsf@gnu.org> References: <837cx8cey0.fsf@gnu.org> <87k01039r3.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> <83tu04xzor.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9432"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: tomas@tuxteam.de Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 02 10:19:01 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pNVkC-0002FK-SB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2023 10:19:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pNVjN-0005P1-AD; Thu, 02 Feb 2023 04:18:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pNVjJ-0005Op-S7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2023 04:18:06 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pNVjJ-0004Iu-HU; Thu, 02 Feb 2023 04:18:05 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=hghPb2TxTKNjsTcBpYHywLA5O/HwyS7qP03s6pvD9Qw=; b=HkGTnCdIrkcl wKJAhU490/rh/o387Zv+qCsCdB0jXE51Eq5ioRoxPpX41V9H/fRKrpcvPyVex+o2Y8cb/+JYC7eqs gqFPYohS17tkNYpTrKH7jw7XJxrC85mzHY/zSpAhdPL6Z3itdYv49pcqRTXfjC4qm6n9e2xSOeXo2 0/DC03Szq5TSmHbB9mlD6GaaHQluYJp69adu621P5heFIqSPp4dxyKdV2h+EgjU0JxzveZsi1vmou PCNHygQ0Gi8stP7hNOR6can/sXLRPb3b49zVIdawPwzUpWUNJWuFs3wvnXAYvdVCDGPKFf2RayZr1 jJ2azIklnlEN0oafSVhoGQ==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pNVjI-0002dk-D7; Thu, 02 Feb 2023 04:18:05 -0500 In-Reply-To: (tomas@tuxteam.de) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:302895 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2023 09:41:46 +0100 > From: > > > What I'm interested in is hearing the _reasons_ why you decided to go > > with the environment variable, because those reasons might be > > important in other uses. Was it just the convenience, or was it > > something else? > > I think one was put forward in the original: > > "one reason is that we need to handle invocations of Emacs deep > within third party Makefiles." Which is exactly why using environment variables is a bad idea, IME. Who says the third-party packages are ready for this?