From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#65157: 30.0.50; Android port post-merge warnings? Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2023 16:45:19 +0300 Message-ID: <83leekl47k.fsf@gnu.org> References: <36bca776-3dbe-83aa-1c81-cdbbba15166b@vodafonemail.de> <87sf8tx9py.fsf@yahoo.com> <83sf8sl5yk.fsf@gnu.org> <87r0ocuyyb.fsf@yahoo.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22713"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 65157@debbugs.gnu.org, jschmidt4gnu@vodafonemail.de To: Po Lu Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 09 15:46:17 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qTjVw-0005ha-RS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 09 Aug 2023 15:46:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qTjVk-0006Q5-Jm; Wed, 09 Aug 2023 09:46:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qTjVj-0006Ph-9R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Aug 2023 09:46:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qTjVi-0004to-ON for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Aug 2023 09:46:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qTjVi-0008FE-Gv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Aug 2023 09:46:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2023 13:46:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 65157 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 65157-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B65157.169158870331583 (code B ref 65157); Wed, 09 Aug 2023 13:46:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 65157) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Aug 2023 13:45:03 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38563 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qTjUk-0008D2-SC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Aug 2023 09:45:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51228) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qTjUi-0008Bf-Se for 65157@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Aug 2023 09:45:01 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qTjUd-0004Ll-GI; Wed, 09 Aug 2023 09:44:55 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=9wrSbLzUo2BUVjxbekBoN5vwpIPGUj40QKfdEeZxaZk=; b=OiG6zP/UF51u IMULXah4Pb3XU+kf8Pr+Ok0YDOOBE3aTcRJawj+XVWecJdKd503mXcLJyQYWTCZ0hgKhkIOMr8bcA udYzXYNRe+IADfSPvLAFveISIKvuL0ZaOhCcrOOQOtLcm9bVniQ8ctlwvYdOQqlY7vzvZndFrX4bv ix339LP2NQBk6UEVxq+48nSYogcfw+uXKRzLipVub7Nm8Gc7gk5YPaYYs2CjWsDEjod/TQo0O8HGv kY3wuP9I/m0ej6TP0fbWcOC93cuzd7IQlaGzGbUS9a5TlxiNx/bh7fW8k/v3OeXRjbh2008zphTDS w51ew6oMBQD/VoFLWIt6jw==; In-Reply-To: <87r0ocuyyb.fsf@yahoo.com> (message from Po Lu on Wed, 09 Aug 2023 21:28:44 +0800) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:267037 Archived-At: > From: Po Lu > Cc: jschmidt4gnu@vodafonemail.de, 65157@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2023 21:28:44 +0800 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > I suggest to add @node's there. > > Thanks. How about @subsection's? The relative importance of the > contents of those node-less sections doesn't justify placement in > their own nodes, IMHO. Why do you need justification for adding @node's? What is the downside of having them. The advantage is clear: easier navigation with SPC and DEL. If you don't need a @node, please ask yourself why you need a @section of @subsection? But if you are dead set on not adding @node's, please make those @node-less @sections @unnumberedsec instead.