From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Ken Raeburn <raeburn@raeburn.org>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does he propose?
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 20:47:34 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83k5092urt.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1825F3C9-40EA-402E-9FE9-6BF0A1207F6A@raeburn.org>
> From: Ken Raeburn <raeburn@raeburn.org>
> Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 03:54:28 -0400
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
>
> On Sep 7, 2009, at 23:20, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >> But if a minor comment change is made in the compiler source, must we
> >> recompile everything?
> >
> > Yes, why not?
>
> Excessive time spent rebuilding things that aren't going to change?
This is why we want to avoid it as much as possible. What I asked is
why do you think we might be able to get away without it.
> >> We don't generally make .o files explicitly depend on the C
> >> compiler.
> >
> > If a compiler can change the ABI, you must.
>
> True. Is that something we need to worry about with Emacs? It's
> changed a handful of times in the history of Emacs, but hasn't it
> generally been backwards-compatible?
Mostly yes, but if you want to be sure...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-08 17:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-07 9:28 build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does he propose? Alan Mackenzie
2009-09-07 9:47 ` Andreas Schwab
2009-09-07 9:52 ` joakim
2009-09-07 10:09 ` Lennart Borgman
2009-09-07 11:37 ` joakim
2009-09-07 10:30 ` Jan D.
2009-09-07 17:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-09-07 17:59 ` Ken Raeburn
2009-09-07 18:32 ` Drew Adams
2009-09-07 18:42 ` Lennart Borgman
2009-09-07 19:22 ` Ken Raeburn
2009-09-07 19:03 ` Glenn Morris
2009-09-07 19:20 ` Drew Adams
2009-09-07 20:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-09-07 21:43 ` more reliable `make' Glenn Morris
2009-09-08 16:46 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-09-10 6:28 ` Glenn Morris
2009-09-10 13:37 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-09-07 20:59 ` build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does he propose? joakim
2009-09-07 21:39 ` Glenn Morris
2009-09-07 21:55 ` joakim
2009-09-07 21:13 ` Alan Mackenzie
2009-09-08 16:48 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-09-08 18:17 ` build broken: no defun org-float-time. A workaround Alan Mackenzie
2009-09-08 19:08 ` Ken Raeburn
2009-09-07 20:06 ` build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does he propose? Eli Zaretskii
2009-09-07 23:39 ` Ken Raeburn
2009-09-08 2:41 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-09-08 3:20 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-09-08 7:54 ` Ken Raeburn
2009-09-08 17:47 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2009-09-08 18:32 ` Ken Raeburn
2009-09-08 17:01 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-09-08 17:51 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-09-09 3:14 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-09-08 2:37 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-09-08 3:14 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-09-08 17:11 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-09-07 10:05 ` Miles Bader
2009-09-07 11:15 ` joakim
2009-09-07 13:35 ` Alan Mackenzie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83k5092urt.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=raeburn@raeburn.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.