From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bzr repository ready? Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:36:56 +0200 Message-ID: <83k4xhoo0n.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87zl6vskq0.fsf@red-bean.com> <874op07kb0.fsf@red-bean.com> <87639fr3w7.fsf@red-bean.com> <87vdhfpil2.fsf@red-bean.com> <87einvxy9c.fsf@red-bean.com> <20091118230952.GB908@muc.de> <87my2jw05z.fsf@red-bean.com> <83skc9pbf7.fsf@gnu.org> <87iqd5vw5n.fsf@red-bean.com> <87vdh29lfo.fsf@red-bean.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1258951072 25654 80.91.229.12 (23 Nov 2009 04:37:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 04:37:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jearl@notengoamigos.org, ian.clatworthy@canonical.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Karl Fogel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 23 05:37:44 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NCQgK-0000GO-K1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:37:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54867 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NCQgJ-00077G-QD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:37:43 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NCQfg-0006sZ-1Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:37:04 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NCQfb-0006qH-8u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:37:03 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=53024 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NCQfb-0006qD-60 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:36:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:62435) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NCQfX-0008Vp-Ka; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:36:55 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KTJ00700ORFMQ00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:36:53 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.70.37.193]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KTJ006PDOTGXG20@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:36:53 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87vdh29lfo.fsf@red-bean.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:117557 Archived-At: > From: Karl Fogel > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , jearl@notengoamigos.org, ian.clatworthy@canonical.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:41:47 -0600 > > Right now, the only question that's come up that I think belongs in that > document is "What should be the standard workflow for Emacs developers > in Bazaar?" That's a question we already had a draft answer for, and > Stephen Turnbull has since improved it (I'm about to review it). Except that alternative workflows were mentioned here since then, and it is no longer clear to me that the one described on the Wiki is the best one. Perhaps we should add a few more there.