From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 21:43:12 +0300 Message-ID: <83k4pxijpb.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87ocfcj7r4.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87631jvpzg.fsf@gmail.com> <4C18211C.3070106@harpegolden.net> <83typ2isns.fsf@gnu.org> <83mxuuicjc.fsf@gnu.org> <83ljadikj1.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1276800277 20792 80.91.229.12 (17 Jun 2010 18:44:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 18:44:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: david@harpegolden.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 17 20:44:34 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OPK4o-0006wn-A3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 20:44:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37703 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OPK4n-0003Lv-6W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 14:44:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=60066 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OPK4W-0003GT-62 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 14:44:20 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OPK4U-0008G4-54 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 14:44:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:44159) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OPK4T-0008F4-Up for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 14:44:14 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L4600G008Z98F00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 21:43:07 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.88.125]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L4600CRQ9BUTSA0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 21:43:07 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:126083 Archived-At: > From: Lennart Borgman > Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 20:32:27 +0200 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, david@harpegolden.net > > Several of us has said that the problem is easily reproduceable. Please show a recipe starting from "emacs -Q". > The conclusions are based on the logic of the source code. But you > seem to think they are unwarranted. Can you please explain what part > of the patches you think are unwarranted or unexplained? I cannot explain anything yet, because I cannot follow your reasoning and thus cannot assess the changes you suggest. That's why I asked the questions you didn't answer.