From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-20101122 windows binaries Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 21:22:11 +0200 Message-ID: <83k4k3976k.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8762vpj9ep.fsf@gmail.com> <87d3pwt759.fsf@home.jasonrumney.net> <871v6cjagz.fsf@gmail.com> <83r5eb995g.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1290541861 9259 80.91.229.12 (23 Nov 2010 19:51:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 19:51:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: sean.sieger@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 23 20:50:57 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PKytC-0003lu-7L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 20:50:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52297 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PKytB-0003t9-Mx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 14:50:53 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38923 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PKyRe-0000QF-Qn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 14:23:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PKyR6-0002CR-FD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 14:22:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:49376) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PKyR6-0002Bh-6I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 14:21:52 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LCC00200QX88100@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 21:20:10 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.9.106]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LCC0013QR1KMID0@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 21:20:10 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:133075 Archived-At: > From: Lennart Borgman > Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 19:39:41 +0100 > Cc: Sean Sieger , emacs-devel@gnu.org >=20 > >> =C2=A0- Releases should or should not include debug info? > > > > It is IMO slightly better to ship the release without debug info. >=20 > Why not ship to versions of the release binaries, with and without = debug info? Because it's pointless. If we want to give users release binaries with debug info, we should just ship such a binary, period.