From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7789: cannot send smtpmail using gmail & tls on woe32 Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 23:02:23 +0200 Message-ID: <83k4ijm5cw.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83y66zmilu.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1294262663 31328 80.91.229.12 (5 Jan 2011 21:24:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 21:24:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7789@debbugs.gnu.org To: Sam Steingold Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 05 22:24:18 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Paaq8-0004NU-Pp for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 22:24:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39462 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Paaq8-0004iF-Ir for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 16:24:16 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34498 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Paapm-0004Wm-LK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 16:23:55 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Paapl-0007ZX-FG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 16:23:54 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:36828) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Paapl-0007ZT-Dq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 16:23:53 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PaaOo-0003i8-9q; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 15:56:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 20:56:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7789 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7789-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7789.129426091314206 (code B ref 7789); Wed, 05 Jan 2011 20:56:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7789) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jan 2011 20:55:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PaaO0-0003h3-UI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 15:55:13 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PaaNx-0003gq-Dy for 7789@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 15:55:10 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LEK00900IAOIK00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for 7789@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 23:02:21 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.127.157]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LEK009KHIFUB950@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 23:02:20 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 15:56:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:43121 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 15:06:27 -0500 > From: Sam Steingold > Cc: 7789@debbugs.gnu.org > > same behavior with the emacs built from the latets bzr sources As expected: smtpmail didn't change a bit in this respect. I don't know TLS enough to suggest how to debug this. Can you connect to the server from telnet using TLS? If so, see if you at all get the server's prompt in response to the login.