From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Error from automake.sg Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 00:48:14 +0300 Message-ID: <83k4cubrs1.fsf@gnu.org> References: <19951.46275.322520.849256@fencepost.gnu.org> <19953.834.704644.933192@fencepost.gnu.org> <4DF122F5.5030701@cs.ucla.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1307656116 30331 80.91.229.12 (9 Jun 2011 21:48:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 21:48:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 09 23:48:32 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QUn5b-0000Gl-QS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 23:48:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35334 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QUn5b-0005YQ-1M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:48:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:37857) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QUn5L-0005Xi-Vg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:48:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QUn5K-0000uh-8D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:48:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:47155) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QUn5J-0000u7-Dx; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:48:13 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LMJ00D00LNIHE00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 00:48:11 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.223.140]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LMJ00D7CLW9B060@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 00:48:11 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <4DF122F5.5030701@cs.ucla.edu> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.175 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:140334 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 12:45:57 -0700 > From: Paul Eggert > Cc: Richard Stallman , emacs-devel@gnu.org > > I'm missing some context since I haven't gotten all the emails, > but I suggest trying it with a fresh checkout. Something like > this, in a fresh directory: > > $ bzr branch bzr://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/emacs/trunk > Branched 104546 revision(s). Why would one need to make a new branch? Is there something that "bzr clean-tree --force --unknown --ignored --detritus" wouldn't do? It's much faster.