From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#5493: 23.1.91; Visiting a versioned file while bzr is running signals an error Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 19:28:32 +0300 Message-ID: <83k495u85r.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83mxzxrsj9.fsf@gnu.org> <83636ksj05.fsf@gnu.org> <83hbblxuz3.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1316363418 4678 80.91.229.12 (18 Sep 2011 16:30:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 16:30:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 5493@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 18 18:30:14 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R5KFy-000283-Mg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 18:30:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58832 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R5KFy-0007B8-9q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 12:30:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:51045) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R5KFv-0007Ar-Gd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 12:30:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R5KFq-0001oM-Jd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 12:30:11 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:60119) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R5KFq-0001o5-6d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 12:30:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R5KKb-0008Gq-PA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 12:35:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 16:35:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 5493 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 5493-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B5493.131636367431758 (code B ref 5493); Sun, 18 Sep 2011 16:35:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 5493) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Sep 2011 16:34:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R5KKA-0008GB-IS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 12:34:34 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R5KK8-0008G2-KP for 5493@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 12:34:33 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LRQ006008HAZA00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 5493@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 19:29:34 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.239.98]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LRQ005DD8HADFR0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 19:29:34 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 12:35:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:51423 Archived-At: > From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen > Cc: Glenn Morris , 5493@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 13:50:31 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> I know what you mean, but I'm having trouble reproducing it right now > >> for some reason. Maybe recent bzr versions reduced this problem? > > > > Right, I don't see it anymore, at least not with "bzr log". "bzr ci" > > will probably still have this effect, though. > > So this report can be closed? No. The problem still exists, at least on Windows, if you replace "bzr log" in the original report by "bzr update" or "bzr ci". I guess you can classify this as wishlist, though (and w32-specific; I cannot reproduce it on GNU/Linux).