From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16039: repeated emacs crashes (in GC?) Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 18:01:21 +0200 Message-ID: <83k3fl53fy.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1386090125 28218 80.91.229.3 (3 Dec 2013 17:02:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 17:02:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16039@debbugs.gnu.org To: emacs user Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 03 18:02:10 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VntMP-0001NX-7D for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 18:02:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43189 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VnsSa-0002QN-Js for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 11:04:28 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36210) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VnsQM-0007am-Ve for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 11:02:18 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VnsQF-0007Ci-8O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 11:02:10 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42561) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VnsQF-0007Ce-5R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 11:02:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VnsQE-00033j-Jd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 11:02:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 16:02:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16039 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16039-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16039.138608651311744 (code B ref 16039); Tue, 03 Dec 2013 16:02:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16039) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Dec 2013 16:01:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56580 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VnsQ4-00033L-JS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 11:01:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:63253) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VnsQ1-000337-PL for 16039@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 11:01:50 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MX800700N58HW00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 16039@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 18:01:19 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MX8007V1N67GS10@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 18:01:19 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:81321 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 16:55:43 +0200 > From: emacs user > > I wrote YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, the Emacs for mac developer, and his response is > > > The backtrace shows that the stack is used up because some deeply > > nested Lisp data structure is recursively traversed in garbage > > collection (or possibly an unknown bug in the GC code). In normal OSX > > applications, the stack depth for the main thread is set to 8MiB by > > default, and Emacs slightly enlarges it to 8720000B (on 64-bit binary) > > by some formula in src/emacs.c: What is the evidence that the stack is used up? Having 136 thousand frames during GC is not unheard of.