From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17560: 24.4.50; wrong type argument if rmail-delete-after-output set Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 20:37:48 +0300 Message-ID: <83k39cl7kj.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1400866704 5229 80.91.229.3 (23 May 2014 17:38:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 17:38:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 17560@debbugs.gnu.org To: Ken Olum Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 23 19:38:16 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WntQ8-0001jK-BI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 19:38:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45017 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WntQ7-0004fW-T7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 13:38:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35333) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WntQ0-0004eV-3r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 13:38:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WntPu-0005rS-LG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 13:38:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:59255) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WntPu-0005rE-IC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 13:38:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WntPu-0004L0-0k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 13:38:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 17:38:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17560 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17560-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17560.140086666216638 (code B ref 17560); Fri, 23 May 2014 17:38:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17560) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 May 2014 17:37:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58132 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WntPa-0004KI-6N for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 13:37:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout25.012.net.il ([80.179.55.181]:32932) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WntPX-0004Jv-DL for 17560@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 13:37:40 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout25.012.net.il by mtaout25.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N6100400EEEC800@mtaout25.012.net.il> for 17560@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 20:34:22 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout25.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N61006GNFHAJ030@mtaout25.012.net.il>; Fri, 23 May 2014 20:34:22 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:89407 Archived-At: > From: Ken Olum > Cc: 17560@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 11:50:59 -0400 > > I'd put > > (if (not count) (setq count 1)) > > in rmail-delete-forward and for consistency make the argument of > rmail-delete-backward optional and add the same code there. > > Unfortunately, that is not consistent with rmail-next-message, for > example. The alternative would be to make the argument not optional and > change all callers to say (rmail-delete-forward 1). The alternative is what I had in mind, yes. > Unfortunately, in previous versions of emacs this would mean to move > backward, so new calls would be incompatible with the old > definition, which I think argues against this plan. I don't think this problem should bother us, as the change in rmail-delete-forward is backward-incompatible anyway. Which reminds me: could you also make a suitable entry in NEWS? TIA