From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: VC mode and git Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 22:38:28 +0300 Message-ID: <83k2y21b9n.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86egoeusg2.fsf@example.com> <87384qzxqy.fsf@igel.home> <83bnjen71r.fsf@gnu.org> <83twx6a7wm.fsf@gnu.org> <83sicq1cvt.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1427485145 2440 80.91.229.3 (27 Mar 2015 19:39:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 19:39:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Allen S. Rout" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 27 20:38:57 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Yba5j-0007m6-Oj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 20:38:51 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51607 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yba5j-0006Hq-4Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 15:38:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37303) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yba5S-0006Hj-76 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 15:38:35 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yba5P-0001gG-1P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 15:38:34 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:44511) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yba5O-0001gA-PL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 15:38:30 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NLV00L00Y8GEV00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 22:38:29 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NLV00LNLYK59F70@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 22:38:29 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:184425 Archived-At: > From: "Allen S. Rout" > Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 15:19:53 -0400 > > On 03/27/2015 03:03 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > I posted earlier 2 workflows I routinely use that are clear candidates > > for "C-x v v". > > > > It might be most useful, and generate the least additional heat, to just > let people who want to use Git as Git be happy in magit-land. It's > clearly superior to vc.el in a long list of ways. No one said that magit users should switch to vc.el, and no one suggested to make any changes whatsoever to magit. This discussion is only about vc.el and its vc-next-action feature. People who are not interested in that feature and don't use it, or don't use vc.el at all, should not fear any changes that will affect them.