From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is it time to remove INTERNAL_FIELD? Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2015 17:41:33 +0300 Message-ID: <83k2x0xobm.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87lhhjuq26.fsf@gmail.com> <5538C48F.2020005@cs.ucla.edu> <87fv7rupcc.fsf@gmail.com> <5538C6C0.2000609@cs.ucla.edu> <83sibr15ac.fsf@gnu.org> <878udjun89.fsf@gmail.com> <83pp6v14cy.fsf@gnu.org> <87sibr84hb.fsf@gmail.com> <83oamf12ax.fsf@gnu.org> <87fv7rqcc7.fsf@gmail.com> <83lhhj10mb.fsf@gnu.org> <877ft0fpax.fsf@gmail.com> <83oamcxx99.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1429972937 1780 80.91.229.3 (25 Apr 2015 14:42:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2015 14:42:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, ohwoeowho@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 25 16:42:08 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ym1HT-0001bO-9X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Apr 2015 16:42:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48563 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ym1HS-00015k-OI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Apr 2015 10:42:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56269) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ym1HG-00014l-O1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Apr 2015 10:41:55 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ym1HB-0002VH-TN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Apr 2015 10:41:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:57942) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ym1HB-0002VC-Lw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Apr 2015 10:41:49 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NND00F009XSZ100@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Apr 2015 17:41:48 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NND00FZ3A5NN550@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 25 Apr 2015 17:41:48 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:185871 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: Oleh Krehel , eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2015 10:28:02 -0400 > > > I'd like to know as well. So far no one objected to leaving the > > trailing underscores for the sake of the concurrency branch. So > > unless someone does come up with objections soon, I'd interpret that > > as meaning that BVAR and KVAR should still append the underscore, and > > the fields marked INTERNAL till today should have that underscore. > > I'm not opposed to removing INTERNAL_FIELD and wouldn't oppose removing > the underscore either. But if Eli wants to keep either of them that's > fine by me as well. Unless the concurrency branch is officially and finally dead, I'd like to keep the underscores, to make it easier to revive that branch, if and when some volunteer emerges. > The only problem I have with this is the fact that we're just going > back&forth on this. We didn't yet get back on this, except in the scratch/remove-internal-field branch.