From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: tags-loop-continue Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 19:47:45 +0200 Message-ID: <83k2n2964e.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83wprimto9.fsf@gnu.org> <56916C10.6050004@yandex.ru> <83oacumqmj.fsf@gnu.org> <56917246.1010800@yandex.ru> <5691795E.9010008@yandex.ru> <83lh7ym725.fsf@gnu.org> <5691D768.3020908@yandex.ru> <83bn8tmnvq.fsf@gnu.org> <56928356.2000609@yandex.ru> <8360z1mkfc.fsf@gnu.org> <5696EE9D.2090708@yandex.ru> <838u3si22k.fsf@gnu.org> <5697C7A8.6060601@yandex.ru> <83wprcgjxk.fsf@gnu.org> <5697DA3B.3070706@yandex.ru> <83io2wggh8.fsf@gnu.org> <5697EC73.6040302@yandex.ru> <83fuy0gf2j.fsf@gnu.org> <5697F3C9.5040702@yandex.ru> <83bn8ogd8c.fsf@gnu.org> <56980073.7050604@yandex.ru> <838u3rhpzk.fsf@gnu.org> <569D3ADC.5060803@yandex.ru> <83si1sa47q.fsf@gnu.org> <56A0659F.1010306@yandex.ru> <83si1q987x.fsf@gnu.org> <56A11160.2010309@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1453398480 5873 80.91.229.3 (21 Jan 2016 17:48:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 17:48:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 21 18:47:49 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aMJKm-0007er-4j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 18:47:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49190 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aMJKl-0007iZ-G5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 12:47:47 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33520) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aMJKZ-0007iT-8Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 12:47:36 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aMJKV-0006Dy-FR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 12:47:35 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:49377) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aMJKV-0006Dn-CH; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 12:47:31 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4454 helo=HOME-C4E4A596F7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aMJKU-0005nK-IO; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 12:47:31 -0500 In-reply-to: <56A11160.2010309@yandex.ru> (message from Dmitry Gutov on Thu, 21 Jan 2016 20:12:00 +0300) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:198511 Archived-At: > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 20:12:00 +0300 > > > Using next-error never occurred to me (there's nothing about that in > > NEWS or in the manual). Yes, that works. But it has the problem you > > mentioned in a past discussion: if you have (say) a Grep buffer from a > > recent search, it's not easy to tell next-error which of them to use. > > I guess the feature you suggested back then for making this easier > > never materialized? Maybe we should introduce it now. > > Its details are still unclear, as far as I'm concerned: both the UI and > the changes in the API, which may be required. > > It's probably too late for 25.1. I'm not sure. I am talking about a new command, which will allow the user to select one of the buffers which have next-error-function set. AFAIU, introducing such a command doesn't require any serious changes anywhere, right? > You probably mean the same as me: 'RET' shows the location in the other > window, and switches to it. 'a' quits the *xref* buffer, then does the same. Yes, sorry for my confusing wording.