From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Processed: Re: bug#19717: 24.4.50; printing.el still uses ps-eval-switch Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 19:32:25 +0300 Message-ID: <83k2ik68h2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83oa7x5wpc.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1464021194 501 80.91.229.3 (23 May 2016 16:33:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 16:33:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 23 18:33:08 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1b4smw-00084F-0e for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 May 2016 18:33:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49260 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b4smv-0002kW-9a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 May 2016 12:33:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58247) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b4smO-0002i8-IF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 May 2016 12:32:34 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b4smL-0001Hl-Fn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 May 2016 12:32:32 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:45224) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b4smL-0001GJ-CZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 May 2016 12:32:29 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3397 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1b4smJ-00088H-7f; Mon, 23 May 2016 12:32:27 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Glenn Morris on Mon, 23 May 2016 11:40:48 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:203960 Archived-At: > From: Glenn Morris > Cc: Emacs developers > Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 11:40:48 -0400 > > GNU bug tracker automated control server wrote: > > > Processing commands for control@debbugs.gnu.org: > > > >> unblock 19759 by 23050 > > Again, this is not necessary. I remembered you said that, but the facts are otherwise, sorry. > Closed bugs are not included in the list at the top of > http://debbugs.gnu.org/19759 They are for me. I do need glasses, but I still see very well, I assure you. > Explicitly unblocking closed bugs is harmful, because if the bug needs > to be reopened for some reason, it won't reappear in the blocking list. Sorry, I have no other way to display the list of blockers as it really is. Maybe it's a debbugs bug, I don't know. But the problem is real, and I did the only thing I know about that helps.