From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Don't complain about changed file when it hasn't changed Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2016 16:49:47 +0300 Message-ID: <83k2evg26c.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83oa4bbq5b.fsf@gnu.org> <83a8funuqw.fsf@gnu.org> <83twe2mdpu.fsf@gnu.org> <83h9a2mabl.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1472737842 32154 195.159.176.226 (1 Sep 2016 13:50:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 13:50:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 01 15:50:39 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bfSNx-0006tw-4J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2016 15:50:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37220 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bfSNu-00084B-Qb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2016 09:50:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36637) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bfSNL-00083z-Ok for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2016 09:49:52 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bfSNI-0008Uq-Ke for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2016 09:49:51 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:60821) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bfSNI-0008UR-He; Thu, 01 Sep 2016 09:49:48 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4782 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bfSNG-0002DT-Gz; Thu, 01 Sep 2016 09:49:47 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Tue, 30 Aug 2016 14:06:02 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:207064 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 14:06:02 -0400 > > >> So if you want to "update the doc" here, we'd have to actually state > >> what the standard definition does (we currently don't do actually that). > > > ... indeed we should state that, because otherwise a naïve user will > > not understand how come she lost this nice feature by just replacing a > > function that is supposed to ask a question and be done. > > OK, I can do that. Thanks. > Of course, this begs another question: should the new test be in > ask-user-about-supersession-threat or in its caller? I placed it in > ask-user-about-supersession-threat for no very good reason (tho I don't > see any strong reasons to move it to the caller either). My preference would be to have the test in the caller, because I doubt that anyone who replaces that function would want to lose the test. But that preference is not very strong.