From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23912: 25.0.95; Abort in gc when working with streams Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 17:40:44 +0300 Message-ID: <83k2ef982b.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87wpkxtmwg.fsf@web.de> <83poqpjro0.fsf@gnu.org> <87oa6973hi.fsf@web.de> <7dcd2856-b9a4-9516-607a-1109d2be2dbc@yandex.ru> <874m81qj9t.fsf@web.de> <83a8hsk662.fsf@gnu.org> <87eg6y8qw4.fsf@web.de> <83oa618far.fsf@gnu.org> <87d1mhb5bc.fsf@web.de> <83h9bs8dw8.fsf@gnu.org> <87furc6pg1.fsf@web.de> <87y44sqqhn.fsf@web.de> <83k2gcuxjc.fsf@gnu.org> <87k2eg27o3.fsf@web.de> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1473777767 26225 195.159.176.226 (13 Sep 2016 14:42:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 14:42:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: michael_heerdegen@web.de, 23912@debbugs.gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 13 16:42:37 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bjoui-0004S5-Qv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 16:42:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49363 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bjouh-0003J4-1e for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 10:42:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45811) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bjouV-0003C3-Fa for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 10:42:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bjouQ-0003HC-G6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 10:42:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:32865) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bjouQ-0003Gv-DU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 10:42:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bjouQ-00037q-5I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 10:42:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 14:42:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23912 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 23912-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23912.147377766911954 (code B ref 23912); Tue, 13 Sep 2016 14:42:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23912) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Sep 2016 14:41:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58810 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bjotV-00036e-6A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 10:41:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54674) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bjotP-000360-QP for 23912@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 10:41:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bjotG-0001VB-8y for 23912@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 10:40:54 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:58239) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bjotG-0001S2-5a; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 10:40:50 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2560 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bjot7-0002b4-04; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 10:40:41 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Richard Stallman on Tue, 13 Sep 2016 08:25:14 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:123257 Archived-At: > From: Richard Stallman > Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 08:25:14 -0400 > Cc: 23912@debbugs.gnu.org > > > Richard, do you perhaps remember, or can try to second-guess, why do > > we set the abort_on_gc flag inside prin1-to-string? I mean this > > fragment of print.c: > > I responded a few weeks ago, with what I thought I remembered, but I > seem to have been mistaken. Alas, I don't know any more now. I think I've succeeded in understanding this mystery: it's a left-over from an old GCPRO, which was replaced with an assertion to make sure GC never happens while this code runs. And since nowadays GCPRO is a no-op, we can remove this flag.