From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25851: 25.2; GTK warning when starting Emacs when desktop file has more than one frame Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2017 22:10:43 +0200 Message-ID: <83k287mocc.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87a89c51qb.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <831suoub86.fsf@gnu.org> <87lgswmi6a.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <83vas0rozb.fsf@gnu.org> <87k28fso3o.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <83o9xrsmrd.fsf@gnu.org> <874lzjsh8t.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <87y3wvqqos.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <83fuj2smzr.fsf@gnu.org> <87wpccmv71.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <87d1e4mq48.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <83innvppz4.fsf@gnu.org> <58B546EE.2030500@gmx.at> <831suipb3r.fsf@gnu.org> <58B5C4A1.6050601@gmx.at> <83shmyno97.fsf@gnu.org> <58B6866B.2040307@gmx.at> <83fuixnf7l.fsf@gnu.org> <58B722AA.4090501@gmx.at> <834lzcok3n.fsf@gnu.org> <58B7FB46.4070203@gmx.at> <83varrn2b6.fsf@gnu.org> <58B85D0A.5030203@gmx.at> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1488485545 5348 195.159.176.226 (2 Mar 2017 20:12:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 20:12:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: nljlistbox2@gmail.com, 25851@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 02 21:12:21 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cjX5D-0000Sj-Be for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 21:12:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54380 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cjX5J-0006CC-9A for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 15:12:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37584) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cjX54-00069s-DH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 15:12:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cjX50-0003Nv-7C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 15:12:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:38715) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cjX50-0003Np-49 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 15:12:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cjX4z-0007A6-SV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 15:12:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2017 20:12:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25851 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25851-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25851.148848548427480 (code B ref 25851); Thu, 02 Mar 2017 20:12:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25851) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Mar 2017 20:11:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36914 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cjX4O-000799-7Y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 15:11:24 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46371) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cjX4M-00078x-0A for 25851@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 15:11:22 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cjX4C-0002xW-I1 for 25851@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 15:11:16 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:33357) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cjX4C-0002xS-EM; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 15:11:12 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2049 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cjX4A-0001Sp-DT; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 15:11:12 -0500 In-reply-to: <58B85D0A.5030203@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Thu, 02 Mar 2017 18:57:30 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:130067 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2017 18:57:30 +0100 > From: martin rudalics > CC: nljlistbox2@gmail.com, 25851@debbugs.gnu.org > > So maybe we should do away with the gtk_window_parse_geometry call, wait > for people to holler and try to fix problems with gtk_window_move calls > followed by something like x_wm_set_size_hint (f, 0, true) if needed. Alternatively, make the current code which allows putting windows off-screen be conditioned by a user option, by default off. Then those who want that will have to deal with the GTK warnings. > But I'm not overly optimistic and would like to hear the opinion of at > least one person with GTK skills first. Me too.